|
|
|
|
|
|
Legislation
|
|
Comments on California AB 1921 with no bill of rights
CLRC submits Davis-Stirling Act rewrite with no concern for protecting homeowner rights
April 11, 2008
By
George K. Staropoli
(View author info)
|
|
|
|
| |
If you read my letter, did Brian Hebert's reply miss the message?
George,
In order to help me better understand your position, would you mind pointing out some specific examples of how an association would violate a member/owner's constitutional rights?
If the same sort of situation could arise in a landlord/tenant relationship, please explain why the situation would be unconstitutional in an HOA, but constitutional in a simple rental (or if you think it would be unconstitutional in both situations, why that would be).
If the example involves foreclosure, please explain how it is unconstitutional for an HOA to foreclose, but constitutional for a bank to foreclose.
Thanks.
Brian Hebert
California Law Revision Commission
Posted Apr 12 2008 11:49PM CEST
|
| |
|
| |
George Staropoli
(View Profile)
scottsdale, Arizona |
| |
|
|
Return to 'Comments on California AB 1921 with no bill of rights' |
Submit a comment
|
|
|
|
