Email

Complaints

User Account

Login/Logout

Search

Talk Back

Tools

Information about Richard I. Fine Richard I. Fine 468 N Camden Dr #200 Beverly Hills, California 90210 Phone: (310) 277-5833     Fax: (310) 277-1543 Supports Homeowner Issues Rank: No ranking. Summary: Richard Fine Files Federal Complaint Against California Judiciary and the State Bar - California's unconstitutional laws removes lawyer's livelihood if they accept cases involving institutional, political or judicial corruption - May 05, 2008 - By AHRC News Services Other Information: • Letter to United States Attorney General - Violations of U.S. Law by Judicial Officers and Employees of the Superior Court of the State of California Richard Fine, a brave and talented California attorney and United States Department of Justice Attorney, has been declared ineligible to practice law by the California State Bar for zealously representing the interests of citizens against corruption. As is usual in California and in most of America, the District Attorney, the Attorney General and the Chief Justice failed to address this judicial violation by a judge. • Attorney Richard Fine resume and some of his unique cases with societal impact Hence this letter to the U. S. Department of Justice and to the United States Congress.Bar Number 55259 ( On October 17, 2007 ordered inactive by California State Bar - the lobby nd licensing association for lawyers Undergraduate School Univ of Wisconsin; Madison WI University of Chicago Law School

1. Los Angeles City Controller Laura Chick Denies Conspiring Against Attorney Richard Fine     Monday, November 5, 2007 Chick Denies Conspiring Against Attorney Richard Fine By a MetNews Staff Writer Los Angeles City Controller Laura Chick denied Friday that she had any involvement in State Bar Court proceedings that have resulted in a recommendation that a Beverly Hills attorney Richard I. Fine. Fine's allegations that he was targeted, in part, because Chick, a public member of the State Bar Board of Governors, has received contributions from lobbyists for the developers of Playa Vista while Fine represents area residents who oppose the project are "frivolous" and "without merit," Chick said through a spokesman. Chick added that she had "absolutely no recollection of any conversation with, or briefing by, the Office of the Chief Trial Counsel regarding Mr. Fine." Fine last week filed a notice in the Los Angeles Superior Court case Environmentalism Through Inspiration and Non Violent Action v. City of Los Angeles (Playa Capital Company, LLC), BS 073182, informing the court that he had been placed on involuntary inactive status by the State Bar and alleging that the State Bar's action was invalid because Chick had a conflict of interest. Fine--who acknowledged in a MetNews interview that there is nothing the trial court can do to remedy the alleged conflict--said in his filing that the State Bar charged him with misconduct "for the purpose of benefiting [sic]...Chick," who, according to public records, received contributions to her officeholder account from lawyers at Latham & Watkins, which represents Playa Capital, as well as from other lawyers and lobbyists interested in the project, and from Playa Capital itself. The donations cited totaled $5,000. Read more.. Copyright 2007, Metropolitan News Company Posted Jun 24 2008 7:29AM CEST     Username withheld , California

Return to 'Richard I. Fine' | Submit a comment

Forums