Email

Complaints

User Account

Login/Logout

Search

Talk Back

Tools

Information about Philip A. Putman - Attorney at Law Philip A. Putman - Attorney at Law P O Box 7336 Huntington Beach, California 92615-7336 Phone: (714)848-5297     Fax: (714)963-8035 http://www.philipputman.com Rank: No ranking. Summary: Email Law Office of Philip Putman • The Law Offices of Philip A. Putman is continuing the RICO investigation - October 23, 2007 Law Office of Philip A. Putman - Santa Ana, California • LAW OFFICE ANNOUNCES RICO INVESTIGATION OF HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATIONS - HOA Investigation - Law Office of Philip A. Putman • Class Action Homeowners vs Greenbrook Homeowners Association, Greenbroob Homeowners, Feldsott & Lee • Palacio del Mar Homeowners Association and Peters & Freedman vs Homeowners Other Information: Case No: INC 029330 - Homeowner v Fairways Homeowners Association CA Bar Number 51368 CA Admission Date January 5, 1972 District District -County Orange Undergraduate School California St Univ Long Beach; CA USA Law School Pepperdine Univ SOL; Malibu CA USA Office: - 3303 Harbor Bllvd., Suite K 11, Costa Mesa, California 92626 Telephone: (800)968-8339.

6. Interesting...     Interesting that a highly paid lawyer such as Stanley Feldsott cannot even spell "ridiculous." Is that what we pay $200 to $300 per hour for? Posted Mar 1 2005 1:49AM CET     Username withheld Mission Viejo, California   5. What a great idea suing these 10 Orange County, California judges!     Ten Judges Hit With RICO Lawsuit - Jason W. Armstrong What a great idea suing these 10 out of control Orange County, California judges! Now Mr. Putman can ask these judges to recuse themselves from presiding over lawsuit he brings in the Orange County Superior Court. Posted Feb 27 2005 6:07PM CET     Username withheld , California   4. Greenbrook homeowners worry about higher insurance and assessments to pay their lawyer Stanley Feldsott     One hundred and forty-eight Greenbrook homeowners have had to hire expensive lawyers as a relut of the class action lawsuit filed by William Tezak. It is rumored that another lawsuit is being prepared by Mr. Tezak against the Greenbrook Homeowners Association and their lawyer. If so, the owners of Greenbrook will pay dearly for their apathy. The premiums the are mandated to pay for will sky rocket. There will be assessments to pay higher insurance premiums and legal fees to the homeowner association lawyer Stanley Feldsott . The homeowners owners should check to see if the board is covering their manager under the Board of Director's insurance policy. If so they should remove the manager from the board policy. Homeowners should not be financing the lawsuits people bring against managers and other independant vendors they contract with. CAI lawyers have been advising board members to cover the managers under the Directors & Officer liability policies to finance their legal fees for defending managers. Homeowners should not hire lawyers who provide such advice and expose them to financial burdens of lawsuits. Posted Feb 27 2005 5:50PM CET     Username withheld , California   3. Maybe some lights will go on in sensible minds when the whole neighborhood gets educated about 'common interest developments'.     Why don't all of you just sit down a minute. The association must now apply civl code section 1368 and explain what Tezak can do to build RV access like other neighbors have done or why they will not let him do it. The association should not just tell him NO and back it up with an attorney, they owe some respect to this member, after all he is an assesment paying memeber isn't he? Association power play. Digruntled California citizen. That's all this is. It will cost everyone some money before it's over. Although I must say, it is one way to get the WHOLE commuity involved! Guess the neighbor's in this matter can't say "it's none of my business... let the board handle it". Maybe some lights will go on in sensible minds when the whole neighborhood gets educated about 'common interest developments'. Posted Feb 21 2005 1:29AM CET     Username withheld SAN CLEMENTE, California   2. America's Courts are built for judgement , not justice     America's Courts are built for judgement , not justice Philip A. Putman - California Attorney Posted Feb 18 2005 7:40AM CET     Username withheld , California   1. A most rediculous lawsuit filed involving a community association and its members     This has got to be, in my opinion, the most rediculous lawsuit filed invoving a community association and its members. The players: Attorney Putnam was reprimanded by the State Bar in 1995 and actually suspended from the practice of law for five months from October 27, 2000 to March 27, 2001 according to State Bar records. Tezak was sued by his Association for building a 29 foot wide gate and related structures without archetectural approval. The Tezaks requested approval twice and received denials both times. They then just went ahead with construction. The Tezaks lost at trial and then lost on appeal. Because of the Tezaks failure to comply with the Court's order, contempt proceedings were initiated. The lawsuit is not a class action, it's just called a class action by Tezak. Members began being served with the complaint on the very same day the Association received a request from Tezak to approve the very gate the association twice denied and the court ordered removed. You don't have to be a genius to figure out whats going on. The alleged violations have been there for years, in many cases approved by the Association and at best involve trivia. Stanley Feldsott Attorney for Greenbrook Fountain Valley Homeowners Association Notes Attorney Philip Putnam and Mr. Tezak has informed AHRC that they will be publishing a detailed response to the preceeding comment by Mr. Stanley Feldsott AHRC staff Posted Feb 15 2005 8:33PM CET     stanley feldsott (View Profile) newport beach, California

Return to 'Philip A. Putman - Attorney at Law' | Submit a comment

Forums