|
|
|
|
|
|
An Article
|
|
Attorney pleads guilty to illegal sewer connection
June 21, 2001
By
Spencer Soper
Copyright North County Times
|
|
|
|
| |
Why can't the FBI investigate lawyers like Peters & Freedman under the R.I.C.O Act?
DEVASTATION IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA - Seniors forced to sell their trailer home shelters to pay homeowner association lawyers Peters & Freedman
Posted Apr 17 2005 2:52AM CEST
|
| |
|
| |
Username withheld
, California |
| |
|
|
| |
This is extremely disturbing. Even if it IS a misdemeanor it is still ILLEGAL!
How can an officer of the court, an agent of the law, one who should be held to the highest moral and ethical standard, AN ATTORNEY, (I know, I know, ya can't help but chuckle at that line) still be allowed to practice or have a license in any way shape or form after pleading GUILTY to an ILLEGAL sewer connection or anything ILLEGAL? Is that the only "ILLEGAL" connection?
I think David Peters' law license should have been put on probation as well.
Posted Dec 7 2004 4:34PM CET
|
| |
|
| |
Username withheld
, ot |
| |
|
|
| |
The current charge against Peters is a misdameanor. However, if he has been using another attorney as a straw man and a conduit to grab peoples' homes in foreclosure, this may be a felony if fraud could be proven. I'd like to hear the thoughts of others on this.
Posted Apr 13 2004 2:53AM CEST
|
| |
|
| |
Username withheld
Mission Viejo, California |
| |
|
|
| |
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Why didn't he just build an outhouse or get a port-a-potty?
Posted Apr 10 2004 7:08AM CEST
|
| |
|
| |
Username withheld
, ot |
| |
|
|
Return to 'Attorney pleads guilty to illegal sewer connection' |
Submit a comment
|
|
|
|
