|
|
|
|
|
|
Press Release
|
|
United States Government Representatives Hear About Theft of Homes by Lawyers and Due Process Violations by America's Courts
Congressman Conyers and Senator Leahy requests list of cases, venue, judges and issues
March 28, 2007
By
AHRC News Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Taffy:
Are we still supposed to put together our reports for the Theft of Homes investigation?
Jack
Dallas, Texas
Posted Jan 25 2008 9:56PM CET
|
| |
|
| |
Username withheld
, California |
| |
|
|
| |
We need Federal Legislation to prevent HOA's from using non-judicial foreclosure methods for fines.
In our case, we believe the HOA is compiling fines against us for alleged violations without telling us, and will then create a non judicial foreclosure process. There appears to be a proviso in the covenants to do so. It states "assesments" which fines could considered as such.
No person should be subject to losing their home without due process of Law. We should be heard on the fines, and there should be no non judicial foreclosures allowed.
When we bought this property, we were told there were covenants for "size of the home" "house colors" "keeping up the landscaping", etc.
There were so many documents, and this non-judicial foreclosure clause was cloaked. We had no idea that such a clause existed.
Posted Jan 4 2008 6:20PM CET
|
| |
|
| |
Michele Sarti
, Georgia |
| |
|
|
| |
I have been fighting to save my home of 20 years from Mortgage Servicing Fraud, Attorney and Lender misconduct for the last seven years, I am soon to present my case in court.
I am attaching a copy of my suit and wish that this suit not be used publicly until my case is resolved. If you wish to contact me I can be reached at xxxxx
Posted Apr 11 2007 11:34PM PDT
Submitted Files
Filename Description File Type File Size Click to download
ThirdpartypetitionKeeling.doc A Texas Case of Mortgage Sevicing Fraud and all that it entails
Username withheld
Houston, Texas
Posted Nov 23 2007 5:45PM CET
|
| |
|
| |
Username withheld
, California |
| |
|
|
| |
I lost my foreclosure case after nearly 2 years on August 23, 2006! I was notified of this loss on November 27, 2006 by my "lawyer" just three days prior to the sale of my home. My "lawyer" that I now found out only filed two motions to the court in that two year time frame. In that same two years my "lawyer" never sent me one single bill! So who was paying him? Not me!
I'm now in bankruptcy court to save my home PRO-SE; as of November 30, 2007 it will be one year without a lawyer and holding my own thus far. I have GMAC Mortgage Corporation in an adversarial hearing as of now, but I think anymore tention will be too much for me to handle on my own.
I have way to many documents that I could send to you, but the two most important documents was sent to me from GMAC Mortgage Corporation showing a difference of $11,556.10; within a eight-month period with NO EXCHANGE of money from me to GMAC since June 2004.
Bottom Line (according to GMAC) I had a negative "Escrow Balance" of $5830.57 as of 11/22/06, but as of July 10, 2007 I had a "Surplus" of $5725.53.
How would you be able to help me out on this case?
Posted Oct 3 2007 2:54AM CEST
|
| |
|
| |
Joseph Seibring
Watseka, Illinois |
| |
|
|
| |
Bravo for your efforts in complaining to Washington. Great to see these CRIMES being reported.
Posted Sep 25 2007 8:44PM CEST
|
| |
|
| |
Username withheld
Woodbury, New Jersey |
| |
|
|
| |
Would like to chat with anyone fighting property tax issue in Georgia. Please contact me.
Posted Sep 14 2007 10:05PM CEST
|
| |
|
| |
Dwight Spencer
(View Profile)
Rome, Georgia |
| |
|
|
| |
I work as a teacher's assistant in the public school, My husband is on Social Security. I am currently in a three party lawsuit in early settlement.
The third party claim filed in the Tulsa District Court and the number is CJ-2004-01490 against Bank of Oklahoma and it alleges Fraud for "failing to disclose all structural reports requested in contract" for sale of the home. Our loan was FHA insured. HUD also asked for proof that the structural problems had been repaired according to the engineer reports. If HUD had seen the two reports we later found out about I don't they would have approved the property for the loan.
There is also Foreclosure by LaSalle Bank as trustee for Holder of R1 1998 pass through certificate. LaSalle has not identified the Holder or owner of securities under the same case number. OCWEN had been the servicer and assigned the mortgage to LaSalle as holder of this security instrument. Court Documents show HUD assigned it to OCWEN with a attachment saying OCWEN would follow hud guidelines.
Chain of Events:
1993 BOK owned and repaired this home for resale then listed it with Caldwell Baker. They paid 28,000 sold it for 78,000
We saw the home for sale and were pre-qualified with FHA loan, not sub prime. The home looked like a new home, new carpet, etc.
We requested in the FHA sales contract that BOK provide us all engineer reports as stipulation to purchase in 1994, once it was disclosed there had been work on the home prior to our seeing it.
We were given one report showing 9 piers had been installed and a new foundation prior to purchase. Nothing else
We had all inspections required by FHA and closed in March 1994
Approximately 8 years later severe structural problems appear. The Piering company failed to return calls even though peir were warranted for 10 years.
I called for other inspectors asking for help and then found out there was another report on this house done for BOK in 1993 that recommending 79 piers. In discovery we found one more Report recommending total regarding of the property.
Prior to the foreclosure I spoke to BOK about the report I found.
I would not have bought this house if I had seen the report recommending 79 piers. I would not have a foreclosure.
In 1996 my husband became disabled due to an injury and two back surgeries.
FHA took the loan on forbearance plan, and in 1997 sent us notice they were selling the servicing only to OCWEN with stipulation to follow HUD regs. OCWEN filed mortgage was assigned
January-2004 due to illness we requested OCWEN assist us with arrangements they refused to.
February 29 2004 we receive notice to dispute debt in 30 days or possible foreclosure. We disputed it with that time.
Prior to end of 30 day period OCWEN FSB assigned mortgage to LaSalle as Trustee for holders of a pass through certificate 1998 Rl, then LaSalle filed a foreclosure. We were never notified by OCWEN of this transfer. LaSalle filed foreclosure the same day.
We filed 3rd party claim for Fraud on BOK.
LaSalle Bank has refused to provide and information about the holders of the pass through certificates, the prospectus, etc.
Now OCWEN Bank who is not listed in court records is hiring the Engineer and appraiser.
LaSalle recently said they would have engineer look at house. I was not to use it against BOK. No mention of not seeing it.
The engineer and appraiser that recently viewed the property said they were hired by OCWEN not LaSalle. OCWEN is not mentioned in foreclosure documents. OCWEN Bank released mortgage to LaSalle in 2004 before they debanked and transferred their assets to OCWEN Loan Servicing 2005.
I overheard appraisers who viewed home last week say the new engineer report recommends 49 piers.
LaSalle/OCWEN is now refusing to let us see the new engineer report or the appraisal.
I recently found out under Oklahoma Disclosure Real Estate Act if LaSalle acquires the property in foreclosure, they will not have to disclose the engineer reports or knowledge of defect at auction even though they have them.
If foreclosure goes through LaSalle can put a couple of piers in to make it look level retouch things and defraud someone again with this legal loophole in the law! (see section 838 exemptions)
I was offered $40,000 for the house by home vestors due to structural problems. If the home had no structural problems I should have $30,000 equity to walk away. I have nothing.
HUD was also defrauded in this case. I told them about the report as soon as I found about about it. They have not been helpful.
Posted Sep 11 2007 1:05AM CEST
|
| |
|
| |
Helen Scott
Broken Arrow, Oklahoma |
| |
|
|
| |
Case Numbers: 03- 04 - 012882 FC
Venue: Circuit Court of Baltimore County
Judges Involved: Non-Assigned
A. Due Process Violation - Judge does not approve foreclosure action filed by mortgage servicer. Only requirement is the clerk of the court assigns a case number. There was no court ordered hearing before approval of foreclosure action. The court required no hearing nor a judge signature is required to grant auction sale of home. (As current law stands, tenant has more rights than a homeowner. Before a tenant is evicted, a court ordered hearing is required before a judge). In contrast, a homeowner is thrown out of home and is not granted a court appointed hearing before a judge.
B. Fraud Upon the Court - Filed fraudulent "Affidavit of Debt." The court or judge does not verify for accuracy with homeowner. No verification of debt is done. Just takes the word of attorneys representing the mortgage servicer.
C. Theft by Deception - Fraudulent "Affidavit of Debt did not indicate accurate total of mortgage payments paid towards loan balance. Overcharged additional mortgage payments, foreclosure, late, interest and attorney fees.
D. Non-performance by Court - Does not require hearing to determine if mortgage servicer's Affidavit of Debt filed is valid. Does not required hearing before approval of foreclosure action. Does not required hearing before auction Sale. There is no direct notice from court itself to notify the homeowner of foreclosure and/or auction sale.
E. RICO -Bank, Mortgage, and Real Estate attorneys draft Foreclosure Law. Attorneys failed to include as part of the law due process hearing requirement. The lack of due process is a major contributor in the foreclosure of homes.
F. Fraud - Attorney's for mortgage servicer filed fraudulent "Affidavit of Debt" did not indicate accurate total amount of mortgage payments that was already paid towards my loan balance. Also, overcharged additional late mortgage payments, foreclosure, late, interest, attorney and miscellaneous fees.
Posted May 9 2007 6:51PM CEST
|
| |
|
| |
amorrisa roberts
Baltimore, Maryland |
| |
|
|
| |
----- Original Message -----
From: JAH@MADHATTERPROJECT.US
To: YesOuiSiJ@aol.com ; megavolts61@yahoo.com ; MadHatterProject@aol.com ; J. A. Hollingsworth
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 5:46 AM
Subject: Fw: United States Government Representatives Hear About Theft of Homes by Lawyers and Due Process Violations by America's Courts
----- Original Message -----
From: JAH@MADHATTERPROJECT.US
To: MadHatterProject@aol.com ; J. A. Hollingsworth
Cc: YesOuiSiJ@aol.com
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 3:52 AM
Subject: United States Government Representatives Hear About Theft of Homes by Lawyers and Due Process Violations by America's Courts
United States Government Representatives Hear About Theft of Homes by Lawyers and Due Process Violations by America's Courts
Congressman Conyers and Senator Leahy requests list of cases, venue, judges and issues
March 28, 2007
By AHRC News Services
Washington, District of Columbia -
Last week members of AHRC News Services asked the staff of Congressman John Conyers - Chair of the United States House Judiciary Committee to open an investigation on the rampant theft of homes and property using the courtrooms across America.
This week one of our editors Taffy Rice and her husband Andy Rice and 28 members of the group We the People Radio and Family Rights Radio met with Congressman Conyers and Senator Patrick Leahy, Chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee. They asked the congressmen to begin an investigation of Due Process violations and theft of Americans' homes by deception using the America's courtrooms.
They have asked that we send them a summary of the the cases to include :
Case Numbers:
Venue: Which Courthouse
Judges Involved:
Issues: Due Process Violation, Fraud Upon the Court, Theft by Deception, Sham lawsuits, Non-performance by Court, RICO. Fraud etc.
If you are a homeowner whose rights were violated and a victim of theft of home or property by deception or fraud please email, fax or mail us a copy and a summary of your lawsuits. We will include it in the summary we will send to both the House and Senate Judiciary Committees at the U. S. Congress
All information will be held in the strictest confidence.
Fax information to 1 (714)475-2870
Call (714)475-2824 to leave a message.
Click here to Email Comments or Send Files or Images. These responses will not be published.
Mail: AHRC News Services, P. O. Box 97, San Juan Capistrano, California 92693
--------------
THIS IS WHAT TOOK PLACE DURING THE YEAR 2003 -
Northeast Justice Court - JACQUELINE MCVAY-
***************************
April 2003 - Delivery of RESTRAINING ORDER
THREE DAYS AFTER SERVICE OF PROCESS WAS MADE,
PARK LAND OWNER - CARL BILLINGS IS VIDEO TAPED ON-SITE
STARTING THE PROCEDURE THE PARK WOULD INSTIGATE THAT DAY TO DISLODGE SINGLE MOTHER AND DAUGHTER.
Ignoring complaints of harassment, BILLINGS points out the first of what would become three lists demanding SEVENTY SEVEN ISSUES OF VIOLATION IN UNDER THREE MONTHS. May - July 2003.
33-1491. Retaliatory conduct prohibited; eviction
Case Number 0708CV-0305648 Judge McVay
Case Type Justice Civil Location N/A
File Date 8/27/2003
***************************
June 3, 2003 - Restraining Order Appeal Hearing
Plaintiff JULIA HOLLINGSWORTH Defendant MIKE SCHMIDT - BUFFALO RIDGE - MICHEAL PARHAM ATTY
Case Information
Case Number 0708CV-0302504 Judge McVay
Case Type Justice Civil Location N/A
File Date 4/18/2003
Party Information
Party Name Rel Sex Attorney
Mike Schmidt Defendant Male MICHAEL PARHAM
Julia Hollingsworth Plaintiff Unknown
Case Calendar
There are no calendar events on file
Judgments
Date (F)or / (A)gainst Amount Frequency Type Status
6/3/2003 A: Julia Hollingsworth $0.00 Principal
***************************
Dec, 4, 2003 - Forcible Detainer Hearing
NINE MONTHS OF CONSTANT EVICTION GENERATING EFFORT BY PARHAM'S DIRECTIVE TO PARK OWNER/EMPLOYEES six months of constant eviction process violates the Arizona Revised Statutes law
http://www.superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/docket/justiceCourts/caseInfo.asp?caseNumber=0708CV0305648
Case Information
Case Number 0708CV-0305648 Judge McVay
Case Type Justice Civil Location N/A
File Date 8/27/2003
Party Information
Party Name Rel Sex Attorney
Frank Hollingsworth Defendant Unknown
Julia Hollingsworth Defendant Unknown
Buffalo Ridge Mobile Home Park Plaintiff Unknown MICHAEL PARHAM
Case Calendar
There are no calendar events on file
Judgments
Date (F)or / (A)gainst Amount Frequency Type Status
12/4/2003 F: Buffalo Ridge Mobile Home Park $1,026.00 Attorney Fee
A: Frank Hollingsworth
A: Julia Hollingsworth
12/4/2003 F: Buffalo Ridge Mobile Home Park $108.85 Costs
A: Julia Hollingsworth
A: Frank Hollingsworth
12/4/2003 F: Buffalo Ridge Mobile Home Park $1,475.83 Principal
A: Frank Hollingsworth
A: Julia Hollingsworth
***************************
For a year, an eviction under violation of FAIR HOUSING/HUD/ADA rules proceeded against a resident who had never been in any violation of codes purchased into during a 1998 original trailer sale, pre-existing in park space, nor again when ownership transferred to Hollingsworth, Frank- out of state owner/renter of space, with Julia as sub-tenant. Both transactions required application/approval by park with a sixty day (60 days) from those sale dates (May 1998 ./ June 2000).
Creating a non-compliance situation by official demand by park authority, violations of compliance issues evolved over eight months with a series of demands which were impossible to satisfy, often creating conflicting demands and when addressed by Julia Hollingsworth in a filing of harassment charges originally granted by JUDGE JACQUELINE MCVAY. APRIL 2003.
During the June 3, 2003 QUASH HEARING OF PROTECTIVE ORDER,
Justice of the Peace Pro Tempore MICHAEL A. PARHAM - LLC Statutory Agent of the Buffalo Ridge Mobile Home / Melody Ridge Parks, conspired with employees (Donna/Mike Schmidt & Pat/Danielle McKinney) to dislodge JULIA HOLLINGSWORTH (resident of space 107 Buffalo Ridge - address 18240 N. 21st Street, #107, Phoenix, Arizona 85023
http://www.superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/docket/civil/caseInfo.asp?caseNumber=CV2003-016101
The right hand date column is the date events are docketed, made history for access by defendant.
Inconsistant time, up to four months after tribunal (judge denied jury request- Judge Jacqueline McVay of Maricopa County Justice Court who ignored prior case of Hollingsworth - protective order of harassment, six months prior- to the day of the Dec. 4, 2003 case of forcible detainer - June 3, 2003 restraining order quash hearing).
SIX MONTHS AFTER SUBMISSION -
MOTION TO SEVER COUNTERCLAIM MADE IS DOCKETED FOR PUBLIC AVAILIBILITY
(Superior Court Judge Janet Barton's office stated I was supposed to learn of this through telephobe calling of that office's secretary)
11/25/2003
022 - ME: Order Signed 11/25/2003
11/20/2003
ORD - Order 4/8/2004
NOTE: SEVERING COUNTERCLAIM AND REMANDING FORIBLE DETAINER ACTION TO NORTHEAST PHOENIX JUSTICE COURT
10/9/2003
MOT - Motion 2/17/2004
NOTE: TO SEVER COUNTERCLAIM AND REMAND FORCIBLE DETAINER TO JUSTICE COURT
Screenshots prove that a Dec. 15, 2003 ruling was docketed the morning of Dec. 13, 2003
TWO DAYS BEFORE BEING HANDED DOWN A RULING WAS DOCKETED.
***************************
Arizona Revised Statutes - TITLE 33 -
http://www.azleg.state.az.us/ArizonaRevisedStatutes.asp?Title=33
Arizona Revised Statutes - TITLE 33 -
Chapter 11 ARIZONA MOBILE HOME PARKS RESIDENTIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT ACT
Article 1 General Provisions
33-1401 Short title
33-1402 Purposes
33-1403 Supplementary principles of law applicable
33-1404 Administration of remedies; enforcement
33-1405 Settlement of disputed claim or right
33-1406 Territorial application
33-1407 Exclusions from application of chapter
33-1408 Jurisdiction and service of process; recovery of attorney fees; treble damages
33-1409 General definitions
33-1410 Obligation of good faith
33-1411 Unconscionability
33-1412 Notice
33-1413 Terms and conditions of rental agreement
33-1413.01 Utility charges; waste, garbage and rubbish removal charges
33-1413.02 Guest fee
33-1413.03 Care givers; treatment plan
33-1414 Prohibited provisions in rental agreements; late payment penalty
33-1415 Separation of rents and obligations to maintain property forbidden
33-1416 Preemption by state; regulation of rents; exception
33-1417 Rebates and referrals prohibited; mobile homes and manufactured homes; damages
33-1418 Incorporated tenants' park purchase association
Article 2 Landlord Obligations
33-1431 Security deposits
33-1432 Disclosure of written rental agreement
33-1433 Landlord to deliver possession of mobile home space
33-1434 Landlord to maintain fit premises
33-1435 Limitation of liability
33-1436 Statement of policy; amendment; contents; new statements
33-1437 Education requirements for park managers; complaint; administrative hearing; civil penalty
33-1438 Transfer of records; sale of park
Article 3 Tenant Obligations
33-1451 Tenant to maintain mobile home space; notice of vacating; clearance for removal
33-1452 Rules and regulations
33-1453 Access
33-1454 Tenant to occupy as a dwelling unit; authority to sublet
Article 4 Remedies
33-1471 Noncompliance by the landlord
33-1472 Failure to deliver possession
33-1473 Self‑help for minor defects
33-1474 Wrongful failure to supply essential services
33-1475 Tenant's remedies for landlord's unlawful ouster, exclusion or diminution of services
33-1476 Termination or nonrenewal of rental agreement by landlord; noncompliance with rental agreement by tenant; failure to pay rent
33-1476.01 Change in use; notices; compensation for moving expenses; payments by the landlord
33-1476.02 Mobile home relocation fund; investment of monies
33-1476.03 Assessments for mobile home relocation fund; waiver
33-1476.04 Relocations due to rent increase; mobile home relocation fund; applicability
33-1477 Failure to maintain by tenant
33-1478 Remedies for abandonment; required registration
33-1480 Landlord liens; distraint for rent abolished
33-1481 Remedy after termination
33-1482 Recovery of possession limited
33-1483 Periodic tenancy; holdover remedies
33-1484 Landlord and tenant remedies for abuse of access
33-1485 Special detainer actions; service; trial postponement
33-1485.01 Removal of mobile home from mobile home park; violation; joint and several liability
Article 5 Retaliatory Action
33-1491 Retaliatory conduct prohibited; eviction
Article 6 Affidavit of Affixture
33-1501 Affidavit of affixture for mobile home in mobile home park
***************************
Case Information
Case Number CV2003-016101 Judge Civil Court Adm 01
Case Type Civil
File Date 9/11/2003 Location Downtown
Party Information
Party Name Rel Sex Attorney
Buffalo Ridge L L C Plaintiff MICHAEL PARHAM
Julia Hollingsworth Defendant Female Pro Per
Frank Hollingsworth Defendant Male Pro Per
Case Documents
Filing Date Description Docket Date Filing Party
11/9/2004 RDS - Remand Docket Sheet 11/9/2004
9/29/2004 RTM - Returned Mail 10/8/2004
8/25/2004 047 - ME: Judgment Of Dismissal 8/25/2004
3/22/2004 RTM - Returned Mail 4/8/2004
2/18/2004 311 - ME: 150 Day Minute Entry 2/18/2004
1/30/2004 RES - Response 4/14/2004
NOTE: TO MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT
1/14/2004 STA - Statement 4/12/2004 Defendant(2)
12/29/2003 RES - Response 4/6/2004
NOTE: TO MOTION TO RECONSIDER INJUNCTIVE RELIEF MANDAMUS
12/29/2003 RES - Response 4/8/2004
NOTE: TO MOTION TO RECONSIDER INJUNCTIVE RELIEF MANDAMUS
12/17/2003 MOT - Motion 1/6/2004 Defendant(2)
NOTE: RECONSIDER INJUCTIVE RELIEF MANDAMUS
12/15/2003 019 - ME: Ruling 12/15/2003
12/11/2003 RES - Response 12/16/2003
NOTE: TO MOTION TO VACATE PREVIOUS ORDER
11/26/2003 MOT - Motion 12/9/2003 Defendant(2)
NOTE: TO VACATE PREVISIOUS ORDER SEVERING COUNTECLAIM AND REMANDING FORCIBLE DETAINER ACTION TO NE PHOENIX JUSTICE COURT
11/25/2003 022 - ME: Order Signed 11/25/2003
11/20/2003 ORD - Order 4/8/2004
NOTE: SEVERING COUNTERCLAIM AND REMANDING FORIBLE DETAINER ACTION TO NORTHEAST PHOENIX JUSTICE COURT
10/9/2003 MOT - Motion 2/17/2004
NOTE: TO SEVER COUNTERCLAIM AND REMAND FORCIBLE DETAINER TO JUSTICE COURT
10/9/2003 RES - Response 2/17/2004
NOTE: TO MOTION TO DISMISS
10/2/2003 MEM - Memorandum 2/27/2004 Defendant(2)
NOTE: AND AFFIDAVIT ACCOMPANYING MOTION TO DISMISS FORCIBLE DETAINER ACTION PROCEEDING
10/2/2003 ANS - Answer 10/6/2003 Defendant(2)
NOTE: MOTION TO DISMISS/DEFERRED
10/2/2003 ODF - Order Deferring Court Fees 3/2/2004
9/11/2003 NOF - Notice Of Filing 9/15/2003
NOTE: OF CIVIL CASE FILE FROM NORTHEAST PHOENIX JUSTICE COURT
9/11/2003 ANS - Answer 9/15/2003 Defendant(2)
9/11/2003 REP - Report 9/15/2003
NOTE: DOCKET PRINTOUT
9/11/2003 ADW - Application Deferral/Waiver 9/15/2003 Defendant(2)
9/11/2003 COM - Complaint 9/15/2003 Defendant(2)
NOTE: COUNTERCLAIM
9/11/2003 ORD - Order 9/15/2003
NOTE: OF TRANSMITTAL
9/11/2003 MOT - Motion 9/15/2003 Defendant(2)
NOTE: TO CONTINUE
9/11/2003 MTD - Motion To Dismiss 9/15/2003
NOTE: COUNTERCLAIM
9/11/2003 MTD - Motion To Dismiss 9/15/2003
NOTE: COUNTERCLAIM
9/11/2003 AFS - Affidavit Of Service 9/15/2003
9/11/2003 COM - Complaint 9/15/2003
9/11/2003 RES - Response 9/15/2003
NOTE: TO MOTION TO CONTINUE
9/11/2003 RES - Response 9/15/2003
NOTE: TO MOTION TO CONTINUE
Case Calendar
There are no calendar events on file
Judgments
There are no judgments on file
***************************
Michael Parham,
Justice of the Peace Pro Tempore-
http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rls=TSHA,TSHA:2006-07,TSHA:en&q=maricopa+county+justice+of+the+peace+pro+tempore+michael+parham
In other cases, this LLC Statutory Agent for Karl Billings/Buffalo Ridge, Melody Ridge Mobile Home Parks worked the remand desk for the Maricopa County court system. He used his position to access court personnel and records so to affect his effective retalitory actions in dislodging a single mother, protected under the Fair Housing Americans with Disabilities Association and had insidious influence in the Maricopa County Courts (Justice & Superior), also able to sway officials in the Attorney General's office of Civil Rights, whose job role is to consider cases of violation regarding housing rights for the disabled. His yearlong effort successfully removed the resident, who was consistantly on-time/in full renter paying for a home which previously had been in compliance for six years, until this corruption took place.
Creating a non-compliance situation by demanding construction, the park withheld necessary paperwork required when rental resident was demanded to apply and receive permit to build, thus using that lack of permit as one of seventy seven issues constructed in under three months.
links:
http://clerkofcourt.maricopa.gov/default.asp
View Case Information:
Civil Cases
Court Calendars, Case Histories, Minute Entries
Justice Court
Court Calendars, Case Histories
BARTON, Janet Associate Civil Presiding Judge 602.506.5340 Central Court Building-7A Profile
MCVAY , Jacqueline 602.372.7000 Dreamy Draw Justice Court
MACBETH, Rebecca 602.372.7000 Moon Valley Justice Court
Corporation List File Number Corporation Name Name Type
L08466871
MELODY RIDGE, LLC L.L.C.
L07363126 BUFFALO RIDGE, L.L.C. L.L.C.
http://www.azjudges.info/home/index.cfm
Posted Apr 26 2007 1:57PM CEST
|
| |
|
| |
julia hollingsworth
(View Profile)
, Arizona |
| |
|
|
| |
I will research and add this question to the list of items I am researching for the next meeting.
Glenn Mangan
Property Manager
Abbey Park Gardens
561-969-6550
----- Original Message -----
From: Lwitzelw
To: abbeyparkgardens@bellsouth.net
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 8:21 PM
Subject: Re: question
Well, It seems when I ask that question in our meetings no one seems to know the answer. I want to see all the records especially from CMC management when they left. Do we have those or did anybody bother to get them. THE QUESTION IS : ARE THEY IN THE CLUBHOUSE? Yess or NOoo
This is a copy of the email I have sent our property manager. Where are our records? This is not the first time I have asked. I have asked where to send a certified letter requesting them but he says I don't need to do that that etc. etc. just putting me off. I am only of many trying to get results.
They are stealing. It shows in the condition of our property, they laugh at us in the meetings, we have a conflict of interest on our board - always have had a board member running the management company. They own a lot of property around here and we don't think they are paying their maintenance on theirs.
Our president installed his own personal gym in the clubhouse that no one else has access to, they kick anyone off the board who tries to get answers. We have tried a recall but they just threaten to kick us off the board again. Illegally. They are in control of us. Please advise what to do. Go to the police, hire a lawyer. WHat? Any advice you can give will help. We are just middle class people trying to have our homes.
Posted Apr 25 2007 12:51PM CEST
|
| |
|
| |
Username withheld
West Palm Beach, Florida |
| |
|
|
|
|
Return to 'United States Government Representatives Hear About Theft of Homes by Lawyers and Due Process Violations by America's Courts' |
Submit a comment
|
|
|
|
