|
|
|
|
|
|
An Article
|
|
Campaign Cash Mirrors a High Court's Rulings
March 16, 2007
By
Adam Liptak and Janet Roberts
Copyright The New York Times
|
|
|
|
| |
Add HOA attorneys, management companies and attorneys to that list. In Arizona, one of the premier attorney lobbyists for the anti-homeowner legislation which has occurred during the past 10 years (contradictory statutes attempting to override older CC&Rs granting fine, penalty 'power' to management companies through Boards, foreclosure 'priority' over even first mortgagors for assessments, 'allowance' of blanket indemnification insurance policies by select insurers using management company 'brokers' covering Board, management and attorneys under one Association paid policy (thus allowing outside 'vendors' such as the attorneys and management concerns to act 'act will' against the homeowners with no reprocussions) is now a 'judge pro tem' (read: hired judge) for the Maricopa County Superior court. Added to the already 'bought' lower court judges (through campaign contributions made through the excessive fees from foreclosure/penalty actions made by these entities from homeowners attempting to challenge these unconstitutional statutes through the lower courts, i.e., small claims justice courts), you have 'handpicked' paid for 'injustice' rather than 'justice' in these actions where the outcome is already preordained before the homeowner makes the first appearance before the 'judge' (another bar member 'associate' of the HOA attorneys).
There is no accountability or laws protecting the homeowners or citizens from attorney/judicial abuse, save a 'review' by affiliated 'Association' or 'Supreme Court judicial review committee)(all State Bar Association) members. Since I am not a politician and not held to 'politically correct' standards, a 'campaign contribution' to any bar member, or corporate industry to judges or legislators is nothing more than a 'bribe,' to call it what it is in plain language.
No homeowner has a 'fair' shake in these actions, the industry, government officials and legal community have stacked the deck with their 'favored' courts and 'favored' judges, in order to reap the rewards of the homeowners property and/or equity.
Our children will never 'own' their own land or property. Our government is insuring that all 'future' home ownership will be 'corporately' owned. An HOA is nothing more than another 'eminent domain' abuse at its core, and attempt by our governing officials to 'rent' rather than allow 'ownership' of any land in this country by private citizens. Looks like not only our freedom of speech is unconstitutionally under attack, but individual citizen's rights to property ownership also.
Big brother has pretty much torn the constitutional to shreds in the past 20 or so years, and is now attempting to 'fine' citizens calling them on these abuses $200,000 per occurrence as 'lobbyists.'
I guess it is becoming more and more clear why there is a provision in that Constitution that members of Congress could not be 'arrested' while 'voting' - the potential for abuse which our founding fathers predicated has become reality, and it is hard to know anymore who the true 'criminals' in this country really are.
Posted Mar 20 2007 2:02AM CET
|
| |
|
| |
Username withheld
Phoenix, Arizona |
| |
|
|
Return to 'Campaign Cash Mirrors a High Court's Rulings' |
Submit a comment
|
|
|
|
