|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I'm a member of The Coast Homeowners Association in San Clemente, California. I fully support SB551.
Our Board has hired an existing homeowner, with the title of ombudsman, at a sweet salary of $82,200 per year. He is supposed to arbitrate differences amongst homeowners and the board, yet this person recently distributed flyers to homeowners to keep me off the board, during a recent election. He's the furthest thing from independent that I have ever seen.
I would welcome a state agency to fulfill this role and give this person the boot. In an association of 575 homeowners, it is apalling how few homeowners get involved, until a special assessment is announced.
Our management company (Progressive Community Management) is supposed to handle homeowner complaints as well as the attorney that's hired by the board at $162,000 per year.
Homeowners are being ripped off, left and right, with no recourse, other than to sue on an individual basis.
Homeowner
Coast Homeowners Association
Posted Jun 26 2006 4:35AM CEST
|
| |
|
| |
Username withheld
, California |
| |
|
|
| |
Whether corruption by CAI is dished out directly through a Homeowners Association or through a bureau, corruption will be served up with the homeowners head on a platter in either place.
Be careful what you wish for with this bill. Watch what is about to happen with CID foreclosures in the next coming years. Non-judicial foreclosures will all but be a thing of the past, with judicial foreclosures growing in vast numbers as homeowners get stuck with escalating assessments in the downturn of the market and hard times.
The CAI industry foreclosure attorneys have already geared up to jump on this. You seem to be underestimating the two-headed monster in the CAI and its ability to reinvent itself in order to not only maintain viability, but to flourish as well.
Homeowner X
Posted Jun 25 2006 10:31PM CEST
|
| |
|
| |
Username withheld
Los Angeles, California |
| |
|
|
Return to 'A CASE FOR SB 551' |
Submit a comment
|
|
|
|
