Talk Back
Login to view our forums
Tools
Send us a note!
Login
Sign Up!
Send an E-Card!
Print This
Customize Site
Our Newsletter

View Newsletter Archive
Poll
Do you trust America's judges to follow the laws and make just rulings that protect rights and property of homeowners in homeowner association cases?
 
Yes
No
You must login to vote on our polls.

View poll results
AHRC

Restitution
Senior Told Her Home Would Be Sold In Two Weeks To Collect A $405. Debt She Did Not Know About

She requests resitution of $3135 paid under protest to collection lawyers Epsten, Grinnell & Howell

March 06, 2003

By Mary L. Tooker

San Clemente, California -



Following is the letter by 75 year old Mary Tooker to one of her three Homeowners Assocations. All three associations collect maintenence dues on her home.

Rancho San Clemente Community Association
To the Board of Directors -
Terry McEntee-Allred - President, Bob Carson - Vice President, Ed Beveridge - Treasurer , Dorothy Spence - Secretary , Curt Rudick - Director

I am at this time requesting the refund of all late fees and legal fees incurred, and paid by me, to Epstein, Grinnell & Howell collection attorneys working on your behalf.

The total paid to Epstein Grinnell and Howell was $3,135. This amount was "paid under protest, with reservations of my rights" to them in order to prevent the slated sale of my property at 1044 Calle Del Cerro, San Clemente, California set for February 5, 2003 at 10am at the Orange City Hall. A copy of the Notice of Sale is attached. It was sent to my correct address , and the only mail EVER received by me concerning assessments due.

I do not believe that "Due Diligence" was used either by Curtis Management , or Epsten, Grinnell and Howell. I was not aware of three associations of of homowners as I had only been receiving bills Vista Pacifica HOA and Ammcor. Both these accounts are current and have never been delinquent. Both associations have had my correct address. A simple letter to either one would have been a simple solution to locating me. It would have been forwarded to me , and not been a violation of the privacy law.

Because I never received anything from Rancho San Clemente Community Association (RSC) , I assumed it was incorporated in some way with my taxes, if I heard about it at all, which I must have.

I closed escrow on June 15, 2001. The property was rented from July 17, 2001 to January 17, 2002. It was vacant until September 27, 2002 at which time it was re-rented. The vacancy occurred due to construction and mold remediation, I also remodeled the unit at that time. I was at the job site whenever it was possible to work. NEVER was one piece of mail delivered to me at that address. NEVER was a notice from RSC ever posted, although I received notices from AMMCOR and vista Pacifica. However, Curtis Management Company continued (they say) to send mail and notices to that address for me for 1 1/2 years, even though it was ALL returned to them.

When I asked Cheryl Sharp why another such as Vista Pacifica wasn't utilized I was told they were not obliged to find me, that was the attorney's job, and it was my responsibility to pay my bills. I concur. However, I can't pay a bill I have never received and don't know that I owe to this day. I have no address for RSC Community Association, but I'll bet i can find one as easily as they could have found mine.

The same procedures were used by Epstein, Grinnell And Howell: even though they knew that all the mail had been returned to Curtis Management, they continued to send mail and notices to the unit address and they were all returned to them!!!!

Except for one dated January 22, 2003 sent to my correct address!!! By now , fees are over $3,000,. I asked Diane Rico why they hadn't used my correct address sooner, her andwer was, " I don't have to disclosre our procedures to you."

Really! I find this who chain of events unconscionable!! In fact, I consider it fraud, with crimminal intent to acquire my property with a $200,000 equity, for a mere $405. assessment due. There was no personal service, no posted notice, nothing.

I asked M. Rico what would have happened had I been in the hospital or out of the country. She replied that it would have been sold. And what about people who have $405. but not $3,135.. Their property would be gone.

No organization should have this kind of power, let alone three organizations working together.

I am going to to my best to see that this never happens to anyone again. If bills need to be changed, so be it. If attorney need to be fined and chastised, for excessive fees, so be it.


This whole procedure is a violation of the Homeowners Rights.

I respectfully request my refund of all fees.
---------

Contact information:

Mary Lee Tooker: Please contact AHRC for her contact information

Debora M. Zumwalt: Collection lawyer with Epsten Grinnell & Howell
Diane Rico - legal assistant
(800)300-1704

Curtis Management: Owner Lee Curtis, Manager Sheryl Sharp (760)643-2200

 
View Comments (7) | Post a comment
 
For more information, please check out the articles listed below:
  • Sea Ranch House Lost Over $567 Debt - Tyra Mead
  • Orange County Pair Might lose home for $120 in missing dues - Ronald Campbell
  • Rancho Niguel HOA lawyers and manager charge sea captain $2823.92 for being late with his $208 association bill - A Sea Captain from California
  • Assessments And Non-Judicial Foreclosure Laws in California Homeowner Associations - Douglas J. Rosner
  • Burden of debt - Emmet Pierce
  • PARKING IN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATIONS - A FINE BUSINESS! - AHRC News Services
  • Epsten Grinnell & Howell - Jon Harry Epsten
  • Kieran J. Purcell - Epsten Grinnell & Howell
  • Curtis Management Company - Lee Curtis
  • Submitted Files
    Filename Description File Type File Size Click to download
    EpstenTooker1.jpg First Assessment Notice Tooker received - Your home will be sold in two weeks. JPEG image data, JFIF standard 55KB Download
    EpstenTooker2.jpg Collection lawyer refuses to give Ms. Tooker copies of notices, postings and bills they mailed and tells her Board will not reduce costs of collections. JPEG image data, JFIF standard 70KB Download
    TookerBill1W.jpg Page 1 of Billing for dues and lawyers fees. Tooker was forced to pay $3135. to Epsten Grinnel& Howell to stop them from selling her home. JPEG image data, JFIF standard 79KB Download
    TookerBill2W.gif Page two of Billing for dues and lawyers fees. The lawyers then added an additional $1300.40 for foreclosure trustee fees and costs and refused to provide her with copies of that paperwork. GIF image data, version 89a, 650 x 936, 11KB Download
    Search AHRC
    Login required
    x
    Article Images

    Ms.Tooker finds there are three associations collecting dues on her house when collection lawyer Debora Zumwalt sends her this letter telling her she was selling her house in two weeks to collect $405 owed .

    Collection lawyer Debora Zumwalt refuses to give Ms. tooker copies of letters and notices they claim they sent.

    Page 1 of Dues Bill.from Curtis Management. They told Ms. Tooker that the Post Office kept returning all 6 bills they sent for the past 1 1/2 years.

    Page 2 of Dues Bill. Ms Tooker owed $405. in dues. She was forced to pay $3135 to stop Epsten Grinnel & Howel from selling her home. It had $200,000 equity.
    Related Articles

    Media coverage needed by Fort Worth , Texas family - AHRC Community Services

    Buyers and Lenders Should Beware of Anything with a Homeowner Association Attached - Kathy Litaker


    American Homeowners Resource Center (AHRC)
    PO Box 97 • San Juan Capistrano • California • 92693
    Telephone: (949) 366-2125  Email:

    © 1990-2008 • AHRC News Services

    Disclaimer: AHRC is an interactive information WEBSITE. The information contained here is that of the users. It is not the opinion of AHRC. AHRC does not WARRANT the accuracy, reliability or timeliness of any information and shall not be liable for any losses caused by such reliance on the accuracy, reliability, or timeliness of such information.

    Powered by AHRCwebsites