CAI attorneys financed by Chubb Insurance 'buy' favorable governance.

March 04, 2001

By Steve Solcich (View author info)

The notorious Huntington Village Community Association is once again in the news!

After Huntington Village was highly exemplified in the "Interim Committee on State Affairs Report to the 76th Legislature---Legal Powers, Duties and Structure of Homeowners' Associations in Texas," it continued to proceed settling lawsuits individually to keep its worthless existence intact. In gangster-like fashion, Huntington Village uses freebie litigation as 'due process' to defend its in-clique's violations of covenants and bylaws.

Most recent--Tom Stuchbery sued HVCA (Case No. 703484, Harris Co. Court At Law No. 4) after responding to a reform-oriented newsletter about director removal and illegal assessment billing. Tom was recently 'bought off' for $25,000 as he wished to move away from the 'closed membership'.

Any member who has challenged the unaccountable directors have faced CAI attorneys financed by Chubb which 'buys' favorable governance that keeps theirs and CAI's stakeholder interests in HVCA.

The vicious director violators will not adhere to corporate formalities and 'agreed to' rights. Since only a few participate as watchdogs in the flawed concept, their credibility is attacked by these new-age gangsters desiring the sickening preservation of their senseless association.

A former member presently has an 18-month old 'closed membership' lawsuit against Huntington Village, and a lawsuit in the County Court of Law seeking an Impression on the Intentional Infliction and the 'outrageousness' of living in such a homeowners' association.

Financed by Chubb, this new-age gangster-representation--the CAI's egregious defense--is desiring to destroy many individuals' credibility in their last ditch effort to save their HOA.

Maintaining corporate governments with such lawsuit 'payoffs' keeps the preservation of these undeclared and unwanted governments.

Payoffs suppress these issues from being justifiably focused in trials, and from becoming an impressionable tool for other homeowners to appropriately use to strike at their own HOA


IV. Revocation of HVCA, Inc. Non-profit Franchise

The State of Texas is allowing a quasi-government, the Huntington Village Community Association, to issue impaired contracts called Covenants to private citizens without full disclosure informing them of the risks of insured protection granted to its directors.

It is a well-established fact the great majority of Huntington Village members do not care if the governing docs are followed, that improper assessments were levied, that elections are formulated according to the by-laws, or that the board of directors use fraudulent inducement, discrimination, deception, litigation abuse, conspiracy and racketeering for its preservation. These are grounds to dissolve the HOA because of the members' inability to govern themselves.

The State of Texas has conspired with city and county officials to practice senseless tax discrimination by allowing the collection of infrastructure fees disguised as "maintenance fees" to cover costs usually paid out of property tax. The State is failing in its duty to assure all nonprofit homeowners' associations fully comply with all corporate statutes and all constitutional rights.

As plead in the foregoing "History and Background Facts", it follows that, Plaintiff seeks the revocation of the non-profit corporate franchise held by HVCA Inc. due to the continuous years of violating the State's corporate formalities causing outrageous harm so directed to the general membership as a mandatory infliction.

The member is requesting the revocation of the association's non-profit franchise on the following alleged grounds:

The grounds for Revocation are defendant's legacy of litigation abuse used to strong-arm its existence

for litigation used as 'due process' to destroy a member's sanity

for its misappropriation of association funds for frequent defense of its directors' violations

for its hiring of only CAI attorneys who will agreeably defend the directors' violations

for making its hired, stake-holder CAI attorneys file frivolous lawsuits claiming delinquent assessments on such members

for its fraudulent inducement and mail fraud in collecting improper assessments not amended nor recorded

for inflicting groundless foreclosure threats

for its use of deception

outright lying and unjustified ridicule in most of its newsletters distributed to the membership

for its inability to govern itself according to corporate formalities in using its governing documents

for its continued distribution and sale of counterfeit covenants to dupe members

for its secretiveness regarding its deed restrictions, their re-invention, fabrication and discrimination used freely as an abuse of power

for having rude, arrogant, abusive, and threatening directors pitting neighbor against neighbor by directors maintaining a 'kangaroo court' for deed restrictions

for having entrenched directors desiring to be unaccountable violators and refusing to resign when demanded

for its threats of arrest to certain members

for its 'closed' membership that is undoubtedly a dictatorship in which a violating mentality is a requirement

for 'driving out' members from the community who tried to participate in the HOA concept

for intimidation and racial discrimination directed at members it does not like; and for its 'sham' elections