|
|
|
|
|
|
Legislation
|
|
CAI/CLAC DECLARES WAR ON ANTI-FORECLOSURE LEGISLATION
CAI/CLAC circulates Petition to defeat SB 1682(Ducheny) and AB 2598(Steinberg)
May 25, 2004
By
AHRC News Services
Copyright AHRC News Services
|
| Sacramento, California - CAI (Community Associations Institute) and CLAC (California Legislative Action Committee) has declared an all out war on two bills in the California Legislature. The first bill, AB 2598 (Steinberg), would ban non-judicial foreclosure completely in homeowner associations. The second bill, SB 1682 (Ducheny) would limit non-judicial foreclosure to amounts of $2,500 and over.
CAI lawyers are furious because these bills would turn off one of their most lucrative financial spigots. Even if a home is never foreclosed on, these attorneys are estimated to make at least $2,000 per transaction. To give you an idea of how much is involved, CAI lawyers, Peters and Freedman, filed 75 Notices of Trustee Sale in San Diego County alone in the years 2000, 2001, 2002. At $2,000 a shot, this would be worth at least $150,000.
Multiply that around the state, and you begin to get into real money.
CAI/CLAC's solution is to "improve the Notice-to-Owner provisions of Civil Code Sections 1350, et seq., and provide for an equitable 'period of redemption' that already may be utilized in judicial foreclosures". (AHRC received this information from a source that stated that "CAI does not understand that we are not all in support of CAI").
This "solution" simply defies logic. An "improved Notice" for something that is inherently unjust is no improvement at all. Giving the Jews at Auschwitz an "improved Notice" of their fate hardly comports with justice. Homeowners do not want to go to a financial Auschwitz.
Skip Daum trots out the usual mantra that eliminating or restricting the use of non-judicial foreclosure "will cause community degredation". Very unlikely.Most associations have hundreds of thousands in reserves that can be used to fund any temporary shortfalls.
Yes, everybody should pay their dues in full and on time. However, many people often hit a bump in the road in life - an accident, illness, loss of a job etc. This could happen to anybody - even CAI members. It should be the public policy of any society to try to keep people in their homes as long as possible. A home is a necessity, not a luxury. Counties wait 5 years before they start to take somebody's home for unpaid taxes. Why should homeowner associations be the exception and have the right to take somebody's home in a hundred days - often for scandalously low amounts? Tom Radcliff lost his $280,000 home for $120. A single lady was homeless for weeks and had to sleep in the back seat of her car because she fell behind $200.
Skip Daum says that the new legislation "will have to go through the expensive court system, and will greatly delay resolution." Amazing! SB 1682 requires Small Claims Court, not the expensive Superior Court! To file in Small Claims is about $20 - in Superior Court, hundreds of dollars. And there are no lawyers allowed in Small Claims Court - and that is where the rub is! All those CAI lawyers will be kept away. And that, of course, is what is driving this CAI/CLAC petition!
CAI/CLAC are like magicians. They try to get you focused on the wrong ball so that they can distract from what is happening with the real ball. They beat their breasts about the alleged calamitous financial woes that these bills will cause to homeowners and homeowner associations. But the real ball is the CAI lawyer fees.
The signatures on their petition will also be a marvellous con job if past petitions are any guide. Nobody will sign as CAI lawyer, but as homeowner. Board presidents will sign as if they have the entire association behind them. AHRC in the past has determined that no association ever voted on a petition, and in most cases, no board of directors authorized the president to sign a CAI/CLAC petition.
So CAI/CLAC will try to use smoke and mirrors to fool the legislature, and maybe try to use a little bit of economic muscle as well. Lobbyists are there to lob money!
AHRC will keep you abreast of all developments, because this is a watershed issue in homeowner associations. CAI lawyers secretly inserted the provision in the Davis Stirling Act in 1985 that gave homeowner associations the right to non-judicial foreclosure. It has been almost 20 years of undiluted financial bliss for CAI lawyers - and financial disaster for homeowners. Homeowners need to stand firm on this one and do everything possible to ensure that CAI does not prevail.
Click here to write Senator Denise Ducheny
Click here for information on SB 1682
Click here to write Assemblymember Darrell Steinberg
Click here for information on AB2598
Here is the petition that is being circulated by CAI/CLAC
Petition to Amend Foreclosure Legislation Please sign the attached petition and fax it back to us right away so we can present them to key legislators in the near future.
Two bills are particularly important and CAI-CLAC has proposed amendments which we will endeavor to get into one or both bills. The petition supports these amendments. Your help is needed to ensure that outcome.
Forward this email to all you know and to all your HOA board members. Suggest that they visit our website: www.clac.org
And, encourage them to sign up on the site to receive our free "CLAC-TRAC" email alerts (like this one).
Thank you for involving yourself in your community's behalf!!!
I will keep you apprised.
Respectfully,
Skip Daum
Administrator/Advocate
Community Associations Institute/
California Legislative Action Committee
916 658 0257
FAX 916 658 0252
See our website at www.clac.org
Common Interest Developments - Need To Collect Dues Assessments
Assembly Bill 2598 (Steinberg)
Senate Bill 1682 (Ducheny, Steinberg, et al)
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM:
Homeowners can lose their homes through non-judicial foreclosure when they fail to pay their dues debt.
BACKGROUND:
Purchasers of homes in common interest developments agreed upon purchase to pay dues (assessments) to their community association for its upkeep, operations, and member service programs. These are debts of the owner which, if not timely paid, will cause community degradation and result in the dues-paying members paying more to cover those who don't pay. Collection of these debts is imperative to the health of the community.
For more than 20 years the communities have been able to access the courts and the non-judicial methods of collecting through liening and foreclosing on these very tardy and delinquent debts. In reality, these traditional and stern consequences usually result in full payment before the house is foreclosed upon; indeed, the use of non-judicial foreclosure results in less than ONE PERCENT of debtors whose house is sold in order to collect the debt; i.e., 99% of debtors pay what's owed before the house is actually sold.
PROPOSED SOLUTION:
Rather than punish the association and the dues-paying members by restricting the collection options, the Legislature should improve the Notice-to-Owner provisions of Civil Code Sections 1350, et seq., AND provide for an equitable "period of redemption" that already may be utilized in judicial foreclosures, guaranteeing a "final" opportunity for the owner to redeem the house.
RATIONALE:
Legislatively revoking an association's right to collect what it's owed through non-judicial foreclosure is punitive, will cost the delinquent homeowners and their associations much more money since they will have to go through the expensive court system, and will greatly delay resolution. Why punish millions of dues-paying members for the neglect or inability of an extreme few?
Too, mandating small claims court action before foreclosing non-judicially will greatly impact the court system in time and money.
The above proposed solutions are proactive, provide an equitable remedy and cost little.
PETITION
I request that California Civil Code be amended to:
1. IMPROVE THE NOTIFICATIONS TO HOMEOWNERS IN COMMON INTEREST DEVELOPMENTS WHEN THEY ARE DELINQUENT IN THEIR DEBTS TO THE ASSOCIATION;
2. PROVIDE FOR A PERIOD OF REDEMPTION WHEREBY OWNERS MAY AVOID LOSING THEIR HOME THROUGH FORECLOSURE;
3. PRESERVE THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION RIGHTS TO SECURE ITS RIGHTFUL CLAIM TO THE AMOUNT OF THE ASSESSMENT AND COSTS OF COLLECTION BY LIEN, NON-JUDICIAL FORECLOSURE, AND JUDICIAL FORECLOSURE.
(FAX SIGNED PETITION BACK TO CAI-CLAC AT (916) 658- 0252
__________________________________________
NAME Email (will only be used for alerts to you)
___________________________________________
ASSOCIATION Fax (will only be used for alerts to you)
___________________________________________
CITY OF PERSONAL RESIDENCE
__________________________________________ |
|
| |
|
View Comments (7) | Post a comment |
| |
|
|
|
Submitted Files
|
| |
Filename
|
Description
|
File Type
|
File Size
|
Click to download
|
| |
Foreclosure petition.doc
|
Foreclosure petition
|
data
|
27KB
|
Download
|
|
|
|
|
|
|