Talk Back
Login to view our forums
Tools
Send us a note!
Login
Sign Up!
Send an E-Card!
Print This
Customize Site
Our Newsletter

View Newsletter Archive
Poll
Do you trust America's judges to follow the laws and make just rulings that protect rights and property of homeowners in homeowner association cases?
 
Yes
No
You must login to vote on our polls.

View poll results
AHRC

An Article
Recusing the Georgia Court of Appeals

Judicial Crimes Condoned

March 20, 2007

By Taffy Rice (View author info)
Copyright Taffy Rice

Atlanta, Georgia -

Recently I had the misfortune of recusing EVERY judge on the GA Court of Appeals. Why would anyone do that? At the time, the actions of the Court of Appeals Clerk,William Martin necessitated just that to uphold the rule of law. Martin had published a decision in violation of law and the rules of the Court in the matter of Lost Mountain Homeowners Association, Inc. (LMHA, Inc.) and the Architectural Control Committee (ACC) of Lost Mountain Township Homeowners Association, Inc. (LMTHA) v. Rice et al, a case precedence erroneously reported by Lexis Nexis and Thomson West, in which covenants and restrictions were illegally imposed upon a deed containing no such contractual restriction (See Attachment - GA Senate Bill 217) by a dissolved corporation and the corporate interests of the Defendant. When my husband and I questioned the illegality of a published "Order," denying our Motion to Declare Order Void, without addressing a single issue raised, allegedly written by a single judge, Clerk Martin refused to identify the authoring judge. But why? And how can you recuse a biased and unlawful judge, when the Clerk REFUSES to identify the judge?

My husband and I in accordance with O.C.G.A. § 9-11-60, had specifically challenged a VOID (and illegal) Order in any court at any time, in which the rendering Judge, Adele Grubbs, dismissed our action with a pending Writ of Prohibition against her, while the GA Court of Appeals immediately disposed of the matter, followed by Martin's refusal to disclose the identity of the judge! So, when a decision by Judge Adele Grubbs undeniably violated GA Law, standing case precedence, any state or federal Constitutional protection, much less the Uniform Commercial Code, how can one recuse a judge the Clerk refuses to identify?

That wasn't the end of the line. After Clerk Martin's refusal to perform his duty, we filed a Writ of Mandamus against Clerk Martin. But leave it to Fulton County Judge Jerry Baxter to cover Brother Martin. So where is judicial redress and due process?

When a man by the name of Ronald Cannon swore under oath to be the President of LMHA, Inc. for all times, a dissolved corporation during the entire litigation, but sold common property my family owned an interest in, as the President of LMTA, Inc., creating billing records to sue us for covenants and restrictions NOT on our deed under LMTHA, Inc., you've got to wonder, where does judicial and corporate fraud end? And the LMTA Covenants he sought to impose were NOT part or binding upon our deed, then it's time to call in the muscle of the politically connected (Bush Administration) law firm of Brock Clay, who published billing records and demanded fees from Judge Grubbs in the corporate name of LMTHA, Inc., owned by my husband and me. It was then, we learned judicial corruption in America today, knows NO bounds and NO restraint by any legal authority or government agency. Welcome NOT to the home of the free, but the indentured, deceived, and threatened!

In a published decision for Rice v. Cannon Case, GA Court of Appeals Judge Andrews wrote, on page 12,

"The Rices' dissatisfaction over the outcome of the prior fence dispute was not limited to Judge Grubbs. They have alleged that various judges, lawyers and officials in Cobb County, along with the Clerk of this Court and the office of the Georgia Attorney General, conspired to deprive them of their rights. In addition to seeking disqualification of every appellate judge on this Court, the Rices sought investigations into this matter by the Georgia Bureau of Investigation, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the United States Department of Justice."

Now, the question is, there was NO evidence of contacts with ALL of the aforementioned governmental agencies in the Cannon Case File, or the action against the Clerk Martin in Rice v. Cannon. There was a letter to my Congressman and Senator, but that was noted by Judge Andrews! So, why would Judge Andrews perform personal investigation or be aware of any contacts by my husband or me NOT in the record, regarding the matter placed before him? Does violating the Code of Judicial Conduct matter anymore (Canon 3B7(e))? Is ex parte communications acceptable bythose charged with upholding the law, but NOT for those seeking lawful redress? And isn't it the duty of every American to and certainly BAR Members, to report crimes?

In the final analysis Judge Andrews is right to a degree. Fraud, corruption, conspiracy, and racketeering do dissatisfy my husband and me. Fortunately, Americans are learning and openly addressing the illegal acts carried out in the name of Georgia and American Courts. It is more than dissatisfying that the country my husband served for 23 years as a Marine Corps Officer (LtCol), would choose to punish law abiding citizens, willfully denying any legal standard. For America to be forced to accept violations of law and lawless behavior, in order to be safe from incarceration or legal assaults, is a travesty and burden, every American will continue to suffer from. How is it ONLY citizens are required to obey the law, and not the government allowed to serve them?

 
View Comments (0) | Post a comment
 
For more information, please check out the articles listed below:
  • Election Challenge - Taffy Rice
  • ~STILL DEMANDING JUSTICE~ - Taffy Rice
  • *Judicial Accountability* - Taffy Rice
  • Invitation to the Georgia Supreme Court - Taffy Rice
  • CAI Fraud Sours! - Taffy Rice
  • SLAPP Subpoena - Taffy Rice
  • JUDICIAL ACCOUNTABILITY - Taffy Rice
  • Judicial Misconduct, Cyber Stalking, and SLAPP Subpoena - Andy Rice
  • ~A Writ for a...Judge?!~ - Taffy Rice
  • ~WRITER CRAMPS!~ - Taffy Rice
  • Love the Video! - Kevin Curtis
  • Judge Brooks Admonished - Taffy Rice
  • Supreme Court Video Has 5 Star Rating - Andy Rice
  • Footnote on an Order? - Taffy Rice
  • Spoils of the Property War - Taffy Rice
  • Patriots Witness "The Property War!" - Andy Rice
  • JUSTICE GOES STALE(Y) - Taffy Rice
  • Katie Bar the Doors! - Taffy Rice
  • Exposing 'Fraud Upon the Court' - Taffy Rice
  • Mankind's Gift - Taffy Rice
  • Wanta Know What is Really Going On? - Taffy Rice
  • The Greatest Bank HEIST Ever! - Taffy Rice
  • MLK LEGACY - Taffy Rice
  • Georgia Homeowner News - Taffy Rice - AHRC Georgia
  • Submitted Files
    Filename Description File Type File Size Click to download
    2007GeorgiaSB217.doc GA Senate Bill to codify the theft of property rights and constitutional protections Microsoft Office Document 82KB Download
    Search AHRC
    Login required
    x
    Related Articles

    Boss Thy Neighbor - CHRISTOPHER CONTE

    The Tale of Two Hats - Peter Amherst

    Standing Up to Today's Tyrants - Elizabeth McMahon

    The New Battle For Britain - AHRC News Services

    Mrs. Swindle loses House over $205 Delinquent Assessments - AHRC News Services

    Orange County Pair Might lose home for $120 in Missing Dues - Ronald Campbell

    Group halts foreclosure against ailing homeowner - Fancis P. Garland

    The American Home- A Thing of the Past - AHRC News Services

    JUSTICE DROWNS IN IRVINE HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION SWIM POOL - AHRC News Services

    CALIFORNIA WRESTLING WITH CHANGES IN HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION LAWS - AHRC News Services


    American Homeowners Resource Center (AHRC)
    PO Box 97 • San Juan Capistrano • California • 92693
    Telephone: (949) 366-2125  Email:

    © 1990-2008 • AHRC News Services

    Disclaimer: AHRC is an interactive information WEBSITE. The information contained here is that of the users. It is not the opinion of AHRC. AHRC does not WARRANT the accuracy, reliability or timeliness of any information and shall not be liable for any losses caused by such reliance on the accuracy, reliability, or timeliness of such information.

    Powered by AHRCwebsites