When I began writing for American Homeowners Resource Center (AHRC), my goal was to provide public information, in hopes other Georgians and Americans would NEVER endure the literal and heinous fraud perpetrated by key members of the GA BAR, working in concert, to establish predatory case precedence against American property owners. Little did I know, the creation of case precedence was key to defying and denying the rights guaranteed to all property owners by law and both Constitutions (GA and US).

To imagine the fact, that evidence was in pleadings and publicly available concerning violations of law, yet elected officials and law enforcement members required to address crime, literally refused to enforce law, was unimaginable to a United States Citizen, whose family roots date back to the 1700s.

But like all realities to include war, deceit and profit motivations, all too often envelope even those who are seasoned or educated. Once in the legal churn, my eyes were opened to the application of uneven playing fields, bias, pecuniary interests, and disdain for anything constitutional. And then, there was the lesson of UCC application and admiralty law. And despite it all, none was more shocking, frightening, and mind boggling than the Masonic roots from which the deception grew!

There were several stories chronicling the journal of my neighbors and the related destruction of GA Property Owners; however the stories of Judge Adele Grubbs acting in violation of her oath of office and in violation of law, to the behest of Richard Calhoun and other BAR Members were those that seemed to be most eye opening for others.

When I wrote of Marla Ailion Wright and her current husband Eddie, incarcerated for debt while under bankruptcy protection and held in jail under the 'Patriot Act,' without any evidence of an alleged crime, I NEVER would have dreamed, like so many other lessons along this journey, the education imposed upon me would continue to escalate in an unending fashion at warp speed!

I was served with a subpoena to appear as a "witness" for Bruce Ailion (Marla's ex - lawyer/real estate type), in a "contempt compliance" hearing. What could I testify to about Marla's incarceration or "contempt" NOT contained in public documents? It really did NOT make any sense or matter, it seems! Mr. Ailion's goal appeared to be, to provide Judge Grubbs jurisdiction over me as an alleged "witness" required to appear under threat of a potential 'bench warrant' issued for non appearance, apparently as a result of my writings as an author for AHRC.

Stated on AHRC was a comment from "Username Withheld Marietta, GA," which indicated the "SLAPP Subpoena" I received was not for a 'contempt compliance' matter, but instead, "Ms. Rice...is now called to Court explain her actions". To this moment, I do not understand how anyone but Mr. Ailion, would know what I was being called to court for, as the initiator of the subpoena!

But it seems according to sources, Mr. Ailion desired as it was conveyed to me, "to get her [Taffy Rice]." To reinforce this statement made known to me freely by a source, was another quote from "Username Withheld Marietta, GA," "If she chooses to refuse, she will face the same consequence of any other person who refuses to answer under oath for their statements." To this moment, I don't know what I was supposed to refuse to answer, but without question, the focus of my inclusion in Marla Wright's contempt compliance, lawfully could not have been either to explain my actions or any refusal to answer under oath. The focus appears to be just as indicated, "to get her".

Based on Mr. Ailion's ties and relationship with Judge Grubbs, coupled with the tendered issues of ex parte communications and actions outside of Grubbs jurisdiction, a repetitive pattern and vexatious plan was apparent. As a result I tendered to the GA Supreme Court a 'Motion for Protective Order and Temporary Restraining Order' along with a 'Motion to Quash...' in the Cobb Superior Court, (both attached). Marla Ailion Wright, tendered personally a Continuance, while her bankruptcy attorney David Miller, awaited the adjudication of his "NOTICE OF BANKRUPTCY DISCHARGE AND MOTION TO STRIKE JUDGMENT ENTERED FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION."

But with all the alternate plans, goals, and efforts, surrounding this alleged "contempt compliance" hearing, much to the surprise of anyone familiar with the Ailion v. Ailion case, Marla's continuance was granted, the first time any of her pleadings with or without representative counsel has prevailed in Judge Grubbs Court. Thank you Lord, my children laid witness to something other than gross injustice. May all praise be to God!

And as to 'Ms. Rice', Judge Grubbs acknowledged she had received a Motion from "some witness," without so much as eye contact, followed by allowing Bruce 30 days to respond. So while, my 'Motion to Quash,' Objection to Subpoena, improper service, and "shield" protection assertion (see attached docs), were NOT heard despite the requirement of a witness to appear under threat of 'warrant,' even when improperly tendered, my family celebrated the joy of another human being, who actually received appropriate consideration in Judge Grubbs Courtroom, a site my family had NEVER beheld.

Despite 18 months of what appears via the publicly filed pleadings to be known and wrongful incarceration for Marla, followed by personal attacks against this reporter who spoke of the matter, Marla Ailion Wright obtained a minor semblance of due process on at least a single issue. To you Lord God, I offer thanks for the joy, of injustice at least temporarily denied!

And in closing, I could not help but note the listing of my pleading to the GA Supreme Court. It appears NOT even the Supremes could understand the nature of the lower court acts, or the requisite and filed protections from same, listing it as, "Unusual Motion - see "Notes" screen"! Now will they correct the atrocities or protect their own? The Supremes witness more mischief!

What will you do to see justice is done? The founding fathers made it clear what each of our obligations was one to another. Are you willing for your children to do your duty and 'provide new Guards for their future security'?

"But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States."