Talk Back
Login to view our forums
Tools
Send us a note!
Login
Sign Up!
Send an E-Card!
Print This
Customize Site
Our Newsletter

View Newsletter Archive
Poll
Do you trust America's judges to follow the laws and make just rulings that protect rights and property of homeowners in homeowner association cases?
 
Yes
No
You must login to vote on our polls.

View poll results
Click here to submit.
Lawsuits provide valuable insight into what is going on in homeowner associations.

The HOA Lawsuit Registry has been created to share information to keep homeowners informed of lawsuits all across the United States.

By sharing this information, homeowners can observe problems occuring in associations, and help prevent exploitation and abuse.

If you have been involved in a lawsuit, or know of a lawsuit involving a homeowners association, please complete our lawsuit reporting form.

We look forward to your involvement!

Sort by:
Click here to hide summaries
Date Plaintiff - Defendant Case Number State
May 30, 2002 Silver Townhouses Association v. Homeowner cv New Mexico
April 18, 2002 GENEVA BROOKS d/b/a COMMITTEE TO REMOVE THE BOARD v. NORTHGLEN ASSOCIATION 06-01-00028-CV - Geneva Brooks v Northglen Associaition Texas
January 03, 2000 Steve Thomas Solcich v. Huntington Village Community Association 999-45796 - Steve Thomas Solcich v Huntington Village Community Association Texas
March 01, 1994 Federal Trade Commission v. Community Associations Institute FTC File No. 931 0085 FTC v Community Associations Institute Federal
May 28, 2002 Jesus F. Martinez v. The Colony at California Oaks RIC 320419 - Jesus F. Martinez v The Colony at California Oaks California
August 02, 2002 Richard Lee Colonel v. Melrose Area Property Owners' Association William Rue Gregg Maureen Meyerson Carl Schlick Julie Schlick Larry Collins Antonio Toscano Yolando Tascano Jerry Blankenship Lindsey Rivers Stanley Ostrowski Constance Ostrowski Dolores Knauff Afton Roberts Kimberly Capozzi Robert Capozzi PAUL MacReynolds Terrance Wilmotte 02-57-CA- Colonel v Melrose Area Property Owners Assoc Florida
July 25, 2002 . v. . NC Appeals Court, Case NO. COA01-661 North Carolina
November 02, 2002 EVA SANCHEZ v. Desert Crest Community Association CASE NO. INC 021408 - Eva Sanchez v Desert Crest Community Association California
February 24, 2002 GREENBROOK FOUNTAIN VALLEY HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION v. WILLIAM MARTIN TEZAK AND ANICE JEAN TEZAK 02CC12362 - Greenbrook Fountain Valley HOA vs Tezak California
July 23, 1997 JARRETT E. THIES AND JACQUELYN D. THIES v. The Law Offices of William A. Wyman ("Wyman") and Champs/The Kelly Group ("Kelly") CIVIL 97-0734 B (CGA) - Thies vs Wyman California
December 12, 2002 Homeowner v. Directors Jerry Schmitz CV-02-610 Arizona
April 21, 2003 Homeowner v. Scott Coghlin 02-3986-02-3986 - Homeowner v Coghlin, Saxon, Cravens -Woodside Owners Asso Texas
March 15, 2002 Trabuco Highlands Community Assn. v. Nancy Head et al.. G027697 - Trabuco vs Head California
December 10, 2002 Homeowners v. The Fairways Homeowners Association INC 029330 - Homeowner v Fairways HOA California
June 04, 2002 Sunstone I Homeowners Association v. Dawyn S Smith CN03-00935RB - Sunstone I HOA v Smith Arizona
August 15, 1997 TSG Independant Property Management v. Marie Walsh 775223 - TSG Management t vs Walsh (Hidden Ridge Board Member) California
November 22, 2002 Forest Lynn Homeowners Association v. Eric & Anne Ripley 022094102 - Forest Lynn Homeowners Association v Ripley Washington
April 10, 2003 Jacob F. Ramon v. Tanglewood Trials Homeowners Association E030386 (Superior Court No. VCV08649) - Ramon v Tanglewood Trials HOA California
June 09, 1998 Andrew Ladick - Appellant (Homeowner - Rancho Santa Margarita Recreation and Landscape Corporation v. Gerald J. Van Gemert 97-1147 (Published) Federal
October 02, 1998 Law Offices of Gerald J. Van Gemert - Petitioner to U.S. Supreme Court v. Andrew Ladick - (Homeowner - Rancho Santa Margarita Recreation and Landscape Corporation San Clemente California) Writ of Certiorari - Supreme Court United States Federal
THE U.S. SUPREME COURT DENIED THIS CERTIORARI
December 24, 1992 The Coast Homeowners Association v. James E. Cooper 02CC00365 - The Coast Homeowners Association vs Cooper,Saba, Campbell, Rage California
February 07, 2003 The Coast Homeowners Association v. James E. Cooper 02CC00365 Motion - Coast HOA v Cooper, Campbell, Rager, Folson California
June 01, 1999 Paladin Group v. City of Murrieta Unknown California
February 12, 2001 COMMITTEE FOR A BETTER TWIN RIVERS (CBTR) v. TWIN RIVERS HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION (TRHA); TWIN RIVERS COMMUNITY TRUST DOCKET NO. C-121-2000 - Committee for a Better Twin Rivers RIVERS v Twin R New Jersey
This case is still in the discovery phase (5/13/2003). (Update from by Nancy Levy)
February 02, 2002 GENEVA BROOKS D/B/A COMMITTEE TO REMOVE THE BOARD v. Northglen Association 02-0492 - Geneva Brooks Texas
On May 26, 2003 David Kahne, Atttorney representing Geneva Brooks wrote: "After the decision by the Court of Appeals, we filed a petition for review by the Supreme Court, and so did the Association. The Supreme Court asked for full briefs on the merits, which we provided. The Supreme Court has not yet said when it will hold oral argument. I expect some time in the fall." -
January 02, 1978 Allied Structural Steel Co. v. Spannaus Citation: 438 U.S. 234 (1978) Federal
April 18, 2003 Melissa Colburn v. Villas at Eastlake Shores Owners Association GIS11535 - Colburn vs Eastlake Shores, Peters & Freedman, Carlos Sosa California
May 03, 2003 Robin Ellen Meyers v. Victoria Woods Homeowners 2003 CA 006328 AB Florida
October 01, 2002 Kathleen Chamberlain v. Las Casitas Condo Association CV 2002-00550 Arizona
Case is scheduled for arbitration July 23, 2003
May 22, 2003 Larry A. Decker and Rosanne E. Decker v. Stoneridge Property Owners Association CV-03-00722 -Decker v Stoneridge Property Owners Association Idaho
Complete Case History - CV-2003-0000722 First Judicial District Court – Bonner County Complete Case History CV-2003-0000722 Larry A. Decker, etal. vs. Stoneridge Property Owners Association Inc. Hearings From To Judge Type 2/23/2004 09:00 AM 2/27/2004 05:00 PM Verby, Steve Court Trial Register of Actions 05/22/2003 NEWC New Case Filed Civil Complaint, More Than $1000, No prior Appearance PETN Petition For Declaratoy Judgment MISC Complaint For Injunction And Damages SMIS Summons Issued 06/09/2003 MOTN Motion To Dismiss-p. Daugharty For Def's No Prior Appearance NOFH Notice of Hearing HRSC Hearing Scheduled - To Dismiss (06/25/2003) 06/23/2003 NOTC Notice of Withdrawal of Motion To Dismiss HRVC Hearing Vacated – To Dismiss 07/08/2003 SMRT Summons Returned AFFD Affidavit on Return of Service - Larry Cunningham,Registered Agent MISC For Stoneridge Property Owners 05/24/03 NOTC Notice Of Intent To Apply For Entry of Default MISC Judgment 07/17/2003 ANSW Def's Answer To Petition For Declaratory Jdmt; MISC Complaint For Injunction & Damages 7/30/2003 HRSC Hearing Scheduled (Status 9-10-2003 01:50 PM) Notice of Hearing 9/10/2003 CTLG Hearing result for Status held on 09/10/2003 01:50 PM: Court Log - #03-775 INHD Hearing result for Status held on 9/10/2003 01:50 PM: Interim Hearing Held 10/30/2003 HRSC Hearing Scheduled (Court Trial 02/23/2004 09:00 AM)—5 day court trial 11/03/2003 HRSC Hearing Scheduled (Motion 12/31/2003 09:00 AM) NOFH Notice of Hearing 11/03/2003 MOTN Motion To Bifurcate Proceedings 11/03/2003 MOTN Motion To Amend Pleadings
March 18, 2002 KARL AUERBACH v. INTERNET CORPORATION FOR ASSIGNED NAMES AND NUMBERS BS 074771 California
The plaintiff prevailed in his case on August 5, 2002.
October 30, 2000 OSCA Development Company v. RONALD W. BLEHM INC019869 - OSCA Development v Blehm, Cottom et al California
Defendants prevailed and were awarded $24,600 in attorney's fees on 12/18/2002. Plaintiffs have appealed the court's decision. See CASE NO. E032843 HEARING RE: MOTION TO FIX ATTORNEY FEES SHIRLEY COTTOM 12/18/2002 - 8:30 AM DEPT. 2F HONORABLE CHARLES E. STAFFORD , PRESIDING CLERK: B. WILLEFORD COURT REPORTER: T. RUNYON OSCA DEVELOPMENT COMPANY REPRESENTED BY/IN STEVEN NAPOLES (APPEARS TELEPHONICALLY) RONALD W. BLEHM , DENNIS W. BLEHM , JEAN CHACANACA , KEITH COTTOM , SHIRLEY COTTOM , MAX G. LUDVIGSON , LORENE E. LUDVIGSON REPRESENTED BY/IN MICHAEL ZITOMER KEITH AND SHIRLEY COTTOM (APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY) PRESENT EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS ARE OVERRULED COURT FINDS REQUEST TO FIX ATTORNEY FEES BY THE MOVING PARTY APPEAR TO BE REASONABLE AND NECESSARY. THE COURT FIXES ATTORNEY FEES IN THE AMOUNT OF $24600.00. AMENDED JUDGMENT TO BE PREPARED AND SUBMITTED BY MICHAEL ZITOMER
December 09, 2002 OSCA Development Company v. Ronald W. Blehm et al E032843 - OSCA Development v Ronal Blehm et al California
Pending
December 16, 2002 RONALD BLEHM et al v. OSCA DEVELOPMENT et al DESERT CREST COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION INC033011 - Ronald Blehm v Desert Crest Community Association , OSCA Develo California
PENDING
July 26, 1999 James Foley v. Osborne Court Condominium C.A. No. 96-360 - Foley vs Osborne Court Condominium Rhode Island
July 25, 2005 Paula J. Frickey v. Glendale Farms Homeowners Association Civil Action No. 05-C-60 - Frickey v Glendale Farms Homeowners Association West Virginia
February 10, 2003 REGENCY PALMS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION v. ARTHUR HALE; et al. INC034015 California
ARBITRATION ORDERED.
February 13, 2003 SUMMERBREEZE TOWNHOMES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION v. ROBERT HERNANDEZ GARCIA INC034086 California
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 7/28/03, 8:30 AM, DEPT. 2J
July 23, 2003 FRANK PARTNOY v. KEVIN SHELLEY 03CV1460 California
IV. CONCLUSION "Plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings is GRANTED. The Court holds that California Elections Code section 11382 is unconstitutional. Furthermore, the Court finds that the Plaintiffs have made the requisite showing for a permanent injunction, namely that they have demonstrated (1) the likelihood of substantial and immediate irreparable injury, and (2) the inadequacy of rememdies at law." The Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings was granted on July 29, 2003.
March 25, 1995 The Guttenberg Taxpayers and Rentpayers Associaton v. Galaxy Towers Condominium Association C-48-94 - The Guttenberg Taxpayers and Rentpayers Associaton v Galaxy Tower Federal
May 30, 2002 Homeowner v. The Fairways Homeowners Association INC 029330 - Homeowners v Fairways HOA - Case 1 California
Judge Fry stated overrule as to libel, but undecided as to slander.
March 13, 2003 THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA v. DAMIAN S. TREVOR 02-O-13107, 02-O-13108, 02-)-13416 California
All three attorneys were disbarred.
January 28, 2002 Name Withheld v. Edgewater Isle Homeowners Association CIV420339 - Edgewater Isle Homeowners Association, Pelican Management Group California
Suit was settled out of court by Association's insurance carrier.
February 07, 1997 George W. Harder v. Desert Breezes HOA 95-10486 - AP 96-91030-George Harder v David Peters, Carlos Sosa, Desert Br New York
October 14, 2003 OSCA Development Company v. Ronald W. Blehm et al (Desert Crest Hoeowners Association) EO32843 - Appellate Ruling - OSCA development v Ronald Blehm California
Riverside appellate judges J. Gaut, P. J. Ramirez and J. Hollenhorst ruled against the homeowners and for the private club owner.
October 16, 2003 Jesus F. Martinez v. Alexandria C. Phillips RIC 386644 - Jesus Martinez v Alexandria C. Philips California
Update: October 7, 2004 Case Martinez vs Alexandria Phillips is set for January 3rd, 2005
March 07, 2003 Lost Mountain Homeowners Association v. J. Andrew Rice 02-1-04560-42 Lost Mountain Homeowners Association vs Rice Georgia
The Judge ruled the fence must come down and we must pay the plaintiffs legal fees, in excess of $34,000. She also ruled the two non-existant entities are the proper parties, in direct contradiction with the evidence, the facts, and the admissions by the plaintiffs themselves. She ruled the fence is in violation of County Code, despite the fact it wasn't an allegation in the suit at the time of trial. This is also contrary to the evidence the County inspected the fence no less than 17 times with no violation found. This is also in contrast to the head of Cobb County Community Development, who handles all zoning issues, testifying there is no violation. We are currently in the appeal process. See attachment for greater detail on the major issues.
August 18, 2003 Pembroke Isles Homeowners Association v. Hortensia Rodon et al 02-6775(02)- Pembroke Isles HOA vs Hortensia Rodon Florida
August 26, 2003 JOHN W. SHAMROCK et al... v. WAGON WHEEL PARK HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION 1 CA-CV 02=0403 - Shamrock v Wagon Wheel Park HOA Arizona
November 06, 2003 ELVIRA MAY STANTON et al v. NORTH HILLS PROPERTY OWNERS' ASSCOIATION CIV 01-0380 BB/ACT ACE - STANTON v NORTH HILLS POA New Mexico
October 17, 2003 Bruce & Wendie Johnson v. Heritage Lake Property Owners Association 67001 0310PL306 - Johnson v Heritage Lake Property Owners Association Indiana
At this point the POA has asked for a 30 day extention to respond. No court date has been set. The POA has until 12/13/03 to answer.
January 19, 1996 Hilltop Village Owners Association v. Information Withheld C9502553 - Hilltop Village Owners Association v Homeowner California
Judgement for the plaintiff. Defendant was ordered to lower the fence and obtain plaintiff's approval within 60 days.
May 02, 1978 Edmund C. MONELL v. GOLFVIEW ROAD ASSOCIATION 76-1918 - Edmund C. Monell v Golfview Road Association Florida
Proceeding was brought to require homeowners' association to remove four speed bumps constructed on a private road by the association over plaintiff homeowner's objections. The Circuit Court for Palm Beach County, Culver Smith, J., entered final judgment denying request for mandatory injunction, and homeowner appealed. The District Court of Appeal, Beranek, John R., Associate Judge, held that in light of uncontroverted evidence that right of homeowner, who had same right to road as all other homeowners in association, to easement over private road was substantially diminished by speed bumps, injunction requiring removal of speed bumps should have been granted.
March 15, 1989 NORMANDY B. CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION and Sol Gordon v. NORMANDY C. ASSOCIATION 87-2655 - Sol Gordon v Normandy Condominium Association Florida
September 23, 2003 Fox Hills West Citizen's Association v. Frederic P. McCann - Maryland 246125-V - Fox Hills West Citizen's Association v McCann Maryland
February 18, 2003 Pointe Mountainside Golf Community Association v. Monta L. Redd - Arizona CV2003-003205 - Pointe Mountainside Golf Community Association v Gammage et Arizona
February 18, 2003 Pointe Mountainside Golf Community Association v. Monta L. Redd CV2003-003205 - Pointe Mountainside Golf v Monte Redd - Duplicate entry Arizona
January 28, 2004 Karen Brown v. Board of Directors - Mesa Madrid Townhomes c/o Jomar Association Services Mesa CV03-07257SC Karen Brown vs Mesa Madrid Townhomes Arizona
October 30, 1998 ROBERT S. CUNNINGHAM v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF ORANGE COUNTY G021233 - Fountain Valley Chateau Blanc v Dept of Veterans & Cunningham California
Court data last updated: 01/23/2004 02:53 PM Docket Entries (Register of Actions) Date Description Notes 12/09/1998 Petition for review filed RPI Fountain Valley Chateau Blanc Etc. Records requested. 12/15/1998 Received: CA Record in G021233 - two Blue Doghouses CA Record in G021948 - one Manila Jacket and Loose briefs 12/29/1998 Answer to petition for review filed Petnr Robert S. Cunningham 12/29/1998 Request for depublication (petition for review pending) RPI Fountain Valley Chateau Blanc Management 01/08/1999 Filed: Joinder/Non-Pty Martin, Wilson & Macdowell Reqt for Depublication Joining in Depub of Fountain Valley 01/08/1999 Opposition filed Response/joinder to Reqt for Depublication Neuland & Nordberg [Non-Party] 01/11/1999 Received: Late joinder/Reqt for Depub Feldsott Lee & Feinbert/Non-Pty 01/15/1999 Received: Response/joinder to Reqt for Depublication--Late Knopfler & Robertson [Non-Party] 01/27/1999 Petition for review & depublication request denied Kennard,J Is of the opinion Petn should be granted
August 07, 2002 Villa De Las Palmas Homeowners' Association v. Paula Terifaj S109123 - Villa De Las Palmas HOA v Terifaj California
Review - Civil Appeal Start Date: 08/07/2002 Case Status: fully briefed Court data last updated: 01/28/2004 08:53 AM Supreme Court Case: S109123 Trial Court Case: INC13318 Court of Appeal Case: E029449 Supreme Court Case: S109123 Division: 2 Case Caption: Villa De Las Palmas Homeowners Assoc. v. Case Type: Civil Filing Date: 04/24/2001
January 29, 2004 Avalon Master Homeowner Association v. James A. Jones and Christopher Minters 03-18902 CACE 12 - Avalon Master v Jones & Minters Florida
See www.chargeavalon.org for case updates
August 08, 2003 Velda Rose Estates Homeowners Association v. Robert Louis Nelms CV 2003-010051 Velda Rose Estates HOA v Robert L. Nelms Arizona
February 24, 2004 JOHN W. BROWN v. ST. LUCIE WEST SERVICES DISTRICT AND ISLE OF CAPRI NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION 04 CA 000281 (OC) - Brown v St Lucie West & Isle of Capri Association Florida
Pending, case filed 2/24/04
January 22, 2004 Rancho Santa Fe Association v. Patricia Dolan-Kng D040637/D041486 (Superior Court GIN005057)Rancho Sante Fe v Dolan-King California
Judgement to plaintiff in the amount $318,293,50 plus costs on appeal.
February 26, 2004 Kimberley Cane v. Edgewater Isle Homeowners Association SCC-101569 - Kimberley Cane v Edgewater Isle Homeowners Association California
Judgment for Plaintiff, against Association, for $250 plus costs.
December 12, 2002 Brook Hills HOA & Cross-Complaintant Bass v. Bass & Cross defendants :John Nilsson GIN 026443 Brook Hills HOA v Bass & Bass v Brooks Hills.Peters California
Judge ruled for Brook Hills Homeowners Association on February 17, 2005. Michael Kim and David Peters of Peters & Freedman asked for $123,019 in lawyers fees. Judge gave them $82,525.50 stating: Plaintiff's request for an award of fees in the amount of $123,019.00 is denied as unreasonable. This amount includes fees not requested or mentioned in the moving papers, but only raised for the first time in the reply; fees for excessive interoffice attorney conferences, unnecessary and duplicative trial work; charges unrelated to Plaintiff; charges unrelated to this action; charges for work performed on behalf of other cross-defendants and for which Plaintiff counsel was reimbursed, and charges which should have been sought much earlier in this lawsuit, per CCP 425.16(j), CRC 2(f), and CRC 870.2(b)(1). Basses have the option of appealing this ruling.
March 09, 2004 Changebridge at Montville Condominium Association v. John F. Gambal A-002750-02T3 - Changebridge at Montville Assoc v Gambal New Jersey
Listed above
February 04, 2000 Alsatian Heights Homeowners Association Inc. v. Irene Britton 00-02-15035CV - Alsation Heights HOA vs Irene Britton Texas
Agreed Judgment Set aside the filed document. No monetary damages. No Judgment against me by the HOA or The Developer.
May 29, 2004 Chestnut Hill Plantation Homeowners' Association v. Todd Whatley 04CP402079 - Chestnut Hill Plantation vs Todd Whatley South Carolina
30 days to answer... pending and investigating
December 26, 2002 Villa Encino Homeowners Association v. Ruth Goodman LC063435 - Villa Encino Homeowners Association vs Ruth Goodman, Betty Solo California
Mr. Harmon is no longer president after selling his unit in February, 2004 and does not reside in the complex and the VEHOA's attorney is still representing him so he does not have to pay his own attorney fees. TRIAL BEGINS JUNE 7, 2004.
July 31, 2004 Sheridan Hils South Homeowners Association v. Paul and Katie Plohocky CJ-2003-5418 Sheridan Hils South Homeowners Association v Plohocky Oklahoma
June 23, 2004 Benjamin Gatti v. Village of Lake Park 3:04CV285 - Gatti vs. Village of Lake Park - North Carolina
Filed Yesturday (June 14th, 2004) Motion of Temporary Restraining Order pending
April 14, 2000 Matthew P. Brown v. Information Withheld 00-1683 - Matthew Brown vs Homeowner Virginia
This case to this date is still pending. The lawyer for the Plaintiff has up to this time asked the defendants to submit three different sets of interrogatories, but has not asked for a court date for the case to be heard. • This case has been non-suited. Therefore no more action is required by defendant. They have only been caused much hardship by the overbearing board member. - August 7, 2004 Update
July 12, 2004 Windmere Homeowners Association v. Information Withheld 76 EQ 2002 - Windmere Homeowners Association v Homeowner Pennsylvania
As of June 7, 2004, Defendant's Petition to Amend Answer with New Matter is granted; Defendant's Motion to Join Additional Defendants is denied; Plaintiff's Motion for Protective Order is granted with respect to financial records, handwritten notes and handwritten minutes, but denied with respect to interrogatories. More depositions to follow. Then admissions, etc. to trial. Plaintiffs are also playing at mediation to buy time until they collect another round of annual dues (2005) as they are hurting financially.
June 14, 2004 Villa de Las Palmas Homeowners Association v. Paula Terifaj S109123 I Villa de Las Palmas vs Paula Terifaj California
May 14, 2004 The HOA board members at Montclair at Lomas Del Lago Estates HOA at the time of the complaint are:Herb Sorensen v. Larry & Kathryn Demry GIN033026 - Montclair at Lomas Del Lago Estates HOA v Larry & Kathryn D California
On May 6, 2004 Hon. Lisa Guy-Schall held a telephone conference with the attorney for the plaintiffs, Mary Goodhue Deutsch, and the attorney for the defendants, Jeffrey Bloom. The results of this telephone hearing were unacceptable to Ms. Deutsch and she requested an oral hearing held on May 14, 2004, with the exact same results: The following is a TENTATIVE, ruling for 5/6/2004, Department 31, the Honorable Lisa Guy-Schall presiding. Case Number GIN033026 MONTCLAIR AT LOMAS DEL LAGO ESTATES HOMEOWNERS vs LARRY DEMRY Plaintiff Montclair At Lomas Del Lago Estates Homeowners Association's Motion for Attorneys Fees Re: Application for Preliminary Injunction is denied without prejudice, as premature. This case has not been adjudicated on the merits. Whether or not there is a prevailing party who may be entitled to attorneys fees pursuant to Civil Code Section 1354 has not been determined. Defendants Larry Demry and Kathryn Demry's request for an award of sanctions pursuant to CCP Section 128.6 is denied. Defendants have failed to establish any bad faith conduct on the part of the Association that warrants the imposition of sanctions under CCP Section 128.6. Defendants Larry Demry and Kathryn Demry's request for an award of sanctions pursuant to CCP Section 128.7 is denied. Defendants have failed to comply with the technical and procedural requirements of CCP Section 128.7 motion. Plaintiff Montclair At Lomas Del Lago Estates Homeowners Association is ordered to serve notice of this Ruling on all parties to this action with 24 hours of the date of this Ruling. If parties wish to orally argue this motion they are required to contact the Court at (760) 806-6350 no later than Monday, May 10, 2004, 3:00pm. Issues for oral argument must be submitted in writing by Tuesday, May 11, 2004, 4:30pm. The party requesting oral argument is required to notify opposing parties and will be required to file a declaration proving notice given. If oral argument is requested, it will be heard on Friday, May 14, 2004 at 1:30pm. If oral argument is not requested, this ruling will become the final order of the Court as of the date of this tentative ruling.
July 13, 2004 Andrew R. Brooks; Pro Se v. Charter Point Community Association